Talk:TREE sequence

I removed the following sentences from the article because they sounded hostile to me, as if they were calling out the googology community.

> However, the estimation was based on wrong arguments by googologists, and hence has never been proved.

> Unlike "usual" arguments in this community based on wrong deductions like "the fast-growing hierarchy depends only on ordinals" or "the existence of the correspondence to ordinals automatically ensures the comparability to the fast-growing hierarchy" [...]

> As we explained in, many googologists roughly talks about "the corresponding ordinals" without proofs and "usual" arguments in this community are based on wrong deductions like "the fast-growing hierarchy depends only on ordinals" or "the existence of the correspondence to ordinals automatically ensures the comparability to the fast-growing hierarchy". Therefore the reader should be very careful if there are statements without peer-reviewed sources or proofs in this wiki.

EricABQ (talk) 02:07, 26 October 2021 (UTC)